Horse Racing System
Purchase
F.A.Q
Proof
Testimonials
Links
Free Articles
Contact
The Dubious Immorality of Online Gambling
The recent back-door legislation which
outlawed online gambling in the USA has been championed as a moral
cause. This is in direct opposition to a Gallup Poll taken earlier this
year which found that 60 percent of adults believe gambling is morally
acceptable.
Chief sponsor Jim Leach (R-Iowa) has
called it one of the most important pieces of family legislation ever
considered by lawmakers. Although by his own admission, gambling is not
prohibited by either the Bible or the Quran, he sees a pastoral function
in the new law, in that it will protect the rapidly-eroding values of
family life.
Others see more of a self-promoting
political function in the legislation, believing it was intended to gain
support from the religious right for Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist
if he decides to run for president in 2008.
Gambling in itself is not inherently
immoral. Many people enjoy a flutter, spending a small proportion of
their leisure money on their chosen sport, whether it be poker, football
or horse racing. At this level, it is little more than an innocent
pastime.
It can, of course, become an addiction
which then has serious consequences. When money earmarked for family
welfare is wasted on gambling then it does becomes immoral. But it is no
more so than any other activity which diverts money from its intended
course.
And if gambling is so immoral, why is Las
Vegas still allowed to flourish?
One argument would be that it’s too easy
to bet online. The convenience of online gambling is undoubted – that’s
part of its attraction. But that convenience lends itself to
unparalleled transparency. As all transactions are conducted through
credit cards, it’s relatively easy to see who’s betting what and where.
It is thus much easier for the industry to monitor activity and set
session limits - on how long people play, and how much they lose.
Any number of arguments could be proposed
and countered.
But the truth is that this is not about
morality. If it was, the hardcore pornography that floods the internet
from the USA would have been targeted years ago. Not to mention the
illegal piracy market which costs legitimate business millions each
year.
This is really a battle between the
established land-based US casino industry and the offshore online
market.
Given that most online casinos are listed
on the UK stock exchange, it’s no wonder the UK is government now
pushing for standardised legislation which will essentially give them
control over the future of the industry.
The British view is that gambling is a
legitimate business and while there are potential problems associated
with online gaming, it is better all round for it to be regulated by
government.
The US stance on online gambling is a
smokescreen. The real reason the legislation was passed was to give
control of US gambling back to the established land-based casinos.
But the UK and EU will not change their
attitudes towards gambling, so the online gambling industry will
continue to grow. Given time, US gamblers will find a way round this
dubious legislation, even if it means opening accounts with offshore
banks.
Which leads to a very interesting two
horse race. The established US casinos, with the implicit consent of
their moralising government, will soon launch their own online sites in
a bid to take back control of their industry. In the meantime, the UK
and EU based casinos will do all they can to entice those US players
into defecting.
Who comes out on top is a matter for
debate. What isn’t is the fact that this ill-conceived and hypocritical
piece of legislation will one day be overturned and consigned to the
rubbish bin of history where it undoubtedly belongs.
| Andy Follin is a dedicated
leisure gambler and author of
a gambler's advice site. He is also an ardent opponent of
hypocrisy, especially that which hides behind the banners of
religion and morality. |
Back
Horse Racing System
Purchase
F.A.Q
Proof
Testimonials
Links
Free Articles
Contact